On October 8, 2024, Pakistan’s Supreme Court began hearing multiple petitions challenging the government’s proposed constitutional amendments. The proposed changes have sparked widespread debate, with opposition parties and civil society organizations voicing concerns about their potential impact on democratic processes and the balance of power.
The amendments in question aim to enhance the executive branch’s powers, particularly in matters related to judicial oversight and governance. Critics argue that these changes could undermine judicial independence and weaken checks and balances in the political system. They also believe that the amendments could centralize authority within the federal government, at the expense of provincial autonomy.
Political parties, particularly the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), have raised strong objections, labeling the proposed amendments as unconstitutional. They argue that the government’s move is an attempt to circumvent judicial scrutiny, especially in light of ongoing corruption investigations involving key members of the ruling coalition.
Supporters of the amendments, primarily from the ruling party, contend that the changes are necessary to streamline governance and reduce bureaucratic bottlenecks. They argue that the judiciary has, at times, overstepped its mandate, leading to delays in key government projects and policies. The government maintains that the amendments will improve the efficiency of governance without compromising democratic principles.
The Supreme Court has indicated that it will take a thorough approach in assessing the petitions, given the potential long-term implications for Pakistan’s democratic framework. As the hearing continues, legal experts believe that the court’s ruling could set a precedent for future interactions between the executive and judiciary, and could either uphold or redefine the existing balance of power.
