Introduction to the Arrest at Lahore Airport
In a significant development, popular Pakistani YouTuber Saad ur Rehman, widely known as Ducky Bhai, was arrested at Lahore Airport by the National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency (NCCIA). The arrest was reported by ARY News and has sparked widespread interest and debate across social media and news platforms. Ducky Bhai’s case highlights the growing scrutiny of online influencers and the legal consequences of digital activities.
Allegations of Money Laundering and Gambling Promotion
According to NCCIA officials, Ducky Bhai stands accused of money laundering activities conducted through online gambling applications. The FIR filed against him alleges that he used his social media influence to promote various betting platforms. This promotion allegedly lured many individuals into gambling and unlawful investment schemes online, activities that are strictly prohibited under national law.
Investigators from the NCCIA have reported the recovery of multiple mobile phones from Ducky Bhai’s possession, as well as suspicious WhatsApp contacts and additional digital data. These findings are believed to be linked to illegal financial transactions within gambling networks, suggesting a complex digital trail involving multiple parties and potentially large sums of money.
Use of Influence and Social Media in Unlawful Activities
The FIR further details how Ducky Bhai allegedly leveraged his online fame and following to encourage participation in gambling apps. By endorsing these platforms, he is accused of inciting followers to indulge in activities that violate Pakistan’s laws regarding gambling and financial transactions. Authorities have consequently initiated a full-scale probe into his assets, seeking to determine the extent of wealth generated through these alleged channels.
Legal Proceedings and NCCIA Investigation Status
After his arrest, Ducky Bhai was presented before a duty magistrate in Lahore. The court subsequently granted a two-day physical remand, allowing NCCIA officials to continue their investigation. Assistant Director Shoaib Riaz has stated that the inquiry is ongoing, with more evidence expected to be uncovered in the coming days. The current focus remains on tracing digital communications, financial records, and any other materials that could substantiate the allegations.
Authorities are also examining other aspects of Ducky Bhai’s financial dealings, including asset tracing, to paint a clearer picture of his involvement in the online gambling networks and the alleged money laundering activities.
Prior Legal Troubles: The Viral Motorway Stunt
This latest arrest is not the first time Ducky Bhai has found himself embroiled in legal controversy. In April 2025, police registered a case against him following a reckless motorway stunt that went viral on social media. The video, which shows Ducky Bhai driving a car at speeds exceeding 200 kilometers per hour, with his foot on the steering wheel and pretending to be asleep, drew significant criticism for its dangerous nature.
The stunt led to swift action from the National Highways and Motorway Police (NHMP), who filed an FIR at Laksian Police Station in Sargodha under Section 279 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC). This section pertains to rash driving or riding on a public way, and the spokesperson for the Motorway Police labeled the stunt as extremely dangerous, highlighting the risks posed to public safety and property.
The Motorway Police stressed that such acts, often performed for social media attention, are highly irresponsible. The authorities have made it clear that stunts endangering lives in pursuit of internet fame will face strict legal consequences, reiterating their commitment to enforcing traffic laws and promoting road safety.
The Broader Context: Social Media and Legal Accountability
Ducky Bhai’s arrest and ongoing investigations shed light on the increasing accountability faced by social media personalities. While online platforms offer vast reach and influence, they also come with responsibilities and legal obligations. The case underscores the importance of ethical conduct and compliance with national laws in the digital age, especially for individuals in the public eye.
