No Evidence, No Global Support’: Analysts on May 7 Slam India’s Attack on Pakistan

In a significant escalation of Global tensions between India and Pakistan, India launched missile strikes on May 7, 2025, targeting alleged militant infrastructure in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and Pakistan’s Punjab province. The operation, named “Operation Sindoor,” was in retaliation for a militant attack in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, that resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, mostly Hindu tourists. India claimed to have targeted facilities associated with banned groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed and Lashkar-e-Taiba. However, analysts and international observers have raised serious concerns about the legitimacy and consequences of the strikes.

Lack of Concrete Evidence

India’s justification for the missile strikes hinges on the assertion that they were aimed at terrorist infrastructure. However, independent verification of these claims remains elusive. Pakistan has reported civilian casualties, including women and children, and has denied the presence of any militant targets at the sites hit. The absence of concrete evidence to support India’s claims has led analysts to question the legitimacy of the operation.

In previous instances, such as the 2019 Balakot airstrike, India faced similar scrutiny. Satellite imagery and on-the-ground assessments revealed no significant damage or casualties at the alleged target sites, casting doubt on the effectiveness and authenticity of the strike .

International Response and Lack of Support

The Global international community has expressed concern over the recent escalation. Countries including the United States, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, and Turkey have urged both India and Pakistan to exercise restraint and avoid further military actions. The United Nations Secretary-General has called for immediate de-escalation, warning of the potential for regional instability and the risk of nuclear confrontation between the two nuclear-armed nations .

Notably, the United States has cautioned against providing unequivocal support to India in its military actions. A report by the U.S. Institute of Peace highlighted the dangers of fully backing India’s operations without clear evidence, suggesting that such support could lead to an uncontrollable spiral of escalation and potentially provoke a global geopolitical crisis .

Analysts’ Critique on Global

Military analysts have criticized India’s approach, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based actions in conflict situations. The lack of transparency and independent verification of the targets raises questions about the strategic objectives behind the strikes. Some experts suggest that the operation may be politically motivated, aiming to bolster domestic support ahead of elections or to divert attention from internal issues.

Furthermore, the analysts warn that without a clear and credible justification for the strikes, India risks isolating itself diplomatically and exacerbating tensions with neighboring countries. The absence of global support for the operation underscores the need for India to provide verifiable evidence and engage in transparent dialogue to address the underlying issues contributing to the conflict.

Conclusion

The missile strikes by India on Pakistan-administered territories have intensified the already volatile situation between the two nations. The lack of concrete evidence supporting India’s claims and the absence of international backing have led to widespread criticism from analysts and global actors. As the situation continues to develop, it is imperative for both India and Pakistan to prioritize diplomatic engagement and evidence-based approaches to prevent further escalation and ensure regional stability.